Contact us
E-Submission
mobile search button
mobile menu button
Search
Advanced Search
Journal of SINOGRAPHIC PHILOLOGIES AND LEGACIES
ABOUT
Aims and scope
About the journal
Editorial board
Open access
Contact us
BROWSE ARTICLES
All issues
Current issue
Most viewed articles
Most downloaded articles
Most cited articles
Search
Author index
Metrics
EDITORIAL POLICY
Publication ethics and malpractice statement
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Submission guidelines
Style sheet
E-submission
ABOUT
Aims and scope
About the journal
Editorial board
Open access
Contact us
BROWSE ARTICLES
All issues
Current issue
Most viewed articles
Most downloaded articles
Most cited articles
Search
Author index
Metrics
EDITORIAL POLICY
Publication ethics and malpractice statement
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Submission guidelines
Style sheet
E-submission
Page Path
HOME
Browse articles
Author index
Author index
Search
Author
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Changseok Kim
1 Article
Examples and Origin of Ancient Royal Documents in Korea
Changseok Kim
J Sinogr Philol Leg
2025;1(2):1-41.
Published online June 30, 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63563/jspl.2025.009
Abstract
PDF
This paper puts forward the concepts of “king’s words†and “king’s documents†and takes as its primary goal the extraction of a corpus of such “documents†from extant sources. In identifying and classifying primary sources found within epigraphic inscriptions and compiled texts, this paper investigates clues within that suggest the original format of “king’s documents.†Among “king’s documents†from ancient Korea, those that were disseminated for a domestic audience include
ryÅng
令 “mandate,â€
myÅng
命 “order,â€
sÅ
書 “document; letter,â€
kyo
敎 “decree,â€
chemun
ç¥æ–‡ “sacrificial address,†and
yujo
éºè©” “final testament.â€
RyÅng
were used for amnesties or calls for recommendations of talented individuals, while
myÅng
was used for matters such as the construction or repair of ceremonial facilities.
Kyo
were used to promulgate important policies or implement measures related to maintaining basic public order. Before the
kyo
document form was adopted in the peninsular kingdoms, there was a type of “king’s document†known simply as
sÅ
.
SÅ
appear to have been diplomatic documents originally, but their function was expanded as they were increasingly used in internal administration. In the mid-second century,
kyo
and
ryÅng
became the basic forms of “king’s documents,†but
sÅ
continued as lower-level correspondence or as diplomatic documents exchanged between kingdoms of equal status. Sacrificial addresses and king’s final injunctions existed since the beginning of the all three kingdoms, but these appear to have been performed orally until a certain point when they were “document-ized†in middle and late period Silla.
13
View
1
Download
TOP